Kudos to Pitch Right for giving me the idea of grading each Furman game performance. Trying to post everyday you have to borrow from the guys that have doing this longer.
Quarterback: A
I really don’t think I could give the Gray/Sorrells duo a lower grade. Zero interceptions, five touchdowns, 28 first downs, 535 yards of offense against a defensive coordinator that was a coach at Furman for the past 14 seasons. Gray looked polished and ready to lead the Paladins. Some will question the dual quarterback play, I happen to like it. I think this offers Furman the opportunity to keep defenses off-balance. This week’s road test against a veteran CAA defense should be a challenge.
Runningbacks: B-
Am I being hard on the runningbacks? I really didn’t expect for the running game to gain less than the passing game. But when you think about it Julius Dixon and the PC defense set out to take away the running game. Still Furman averaged 4.1 yards per carry but all the runningbacks were held out of the endzone. I’m still excited about the depth Furman has at runningback. Gipson will be pressed this season LaFrance and Brown are very promising backs. Major points to Mike Brown for making the block of the game.
Fullbacks: B
Jerome did what was asked of him 12 rushes 56 yards, 4.7 average, and one receiving touchdown. Brantley Kendall again showed his ability to catch the ball, score touchdowns, block and be a solid backup to Felton.
Wide Receivers: A
Sprague, Webb, Williams, stepped up big in the first game of the season. The good news here is; one – that the coaches are not going to be afraid to go to the air when a defense stacks against the run. Two – Furman has the receivers this season to stretch teams vertically. I really like this receiving corp, they have size, speed and I think they will play physical. The only negative from the PC game was the inability to get the ball to Mims.
Tight Ends: B+
I like our tight ends. They are big, mobile, and they can block and catch. Russ had a helluva game, catching a touchdown but he suffered an ankle injury. Hedden gives Furman a rare one-two punch at tight end in FCS. Hedden is a great receiver and he’s big. The Truss injury could open the opportunity for true frosh Set Skogan.
Offensive Line: B-
The O-Line had a lot thrown at them by the PC defense. They did a good job but some miscues by the line cost Furman yardage and some possible scores.
Safeties: B
Twitty and Thacker played a very solid physical game, and that’s what we needed to see. I think those two will develop as a team nicely. The play of Lerner and Hicks could cause debate for an even higher rank. These two guys are hitters and they are solid tacklers. As they gain experience these guys will help Furman greatly against the likes of Elon, Citadel, and APP.
Corners: B+
Middleton, Holmes, Austin, and Gourdin played very well. They did give up some yards on some big pass plays but I will chalk this game up to an unknown opponent. This week will be a bigger test as they will be needed to provided more run support.
Linebackers: B
Our experienced linebacker corp had a slow night. Why? The defensive line did such good job and PC only ran 31 times. Twitty made the play of the game for the linebackers, making a beautiful interception. These guys should make plenty of noise this weekend.
Defensive Line: A
Pinilla is obviously a great positions coach and the young defensive line is coming along fine. I know there will be worries about size, but Furman is blessed with a lot of depth. The only worry here is Ricky Jones ankle, hope we get that big guy back out on the field. The defensive end position looks to still be a competition. White, Mars, and newcomer Welch all looked very good in Roy’s old spot. I believe Welch is going to be really special.
Special Teams: B
The Special Teams are the hardest to grade. They did some very good things. A blocked punt, a 54 yard field goal, excellent coverage on punts and kickoffs. The only negative is kicking consistency. 2 missed field goals and an extra point could be costly in a tight game.